2013-14 Annual Reports on the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act (ATIP)

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

1. The Access to Information Act

September 2014

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
30 Victoria Street, 1^st Floor
Gatineau, Quebec
K1A 1H3

819-994-5444, 1-800-282-1376
Fax 819-994-5424

Introduction

The Access to Information Act (ATIA) came into effect on July 1, 1983. It provides Canadian citizens, permanent residents and any person and corporation present in Canada a right of access to information contained in government records, subject to certain specific and limited exceptions.

When the Federal Accountability Act received Royal Assent on December 12, 2006, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) was added to Schedule I of the ATIA along with other Agents of Parliament. Therefore, while not initially subject to the ATIA, the OPC became so on April 1, 2007.

Section 72 of the ATIA requires that the head of every federal government institution submit an annual report to Parliament on the administration of the Act within their institutions during the fiscal year.

The OPC is pleased to submit its seventh Annual Report which describes how we fulfilled our responsibilities under the ATIA in 2013-2014.

Mandate and Mission of the OPC

The mandate of the OPC is to oversee compliance with both the Privacy Act (PA), which covers the personal information handling practices of federal government departments and agencies, and the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA), Canada’s private sector privacy law.

The OPC’s mission is to protect and promote the privacy rights of individuals.

The Commissioner works independently from any other part of the government to investigate privacy complaints from individuals with respect to the federal public sector and certain aspects of the private sector. In public sector matters, individuals may complain to the Commissioner about any matter specified in section 29 of the PA.

For matters relating to personal information in the private sector, the Commissioner may investigate complaints under section 11 of PIPEDA except in the provinces that have adopted substantially similar privacy legislation, namely Quebec, British Columbia, and Alberta. Ontario, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador now fall into this category with respect to personal health information held by health information custodians under their health sector privacy laws. However, even in those provinces with substantially similar legislation, and elsewhere in Canada, PIPEDA continues to apply to personal information collected, used or disclosed by all federal works, undertakings and businesses, including personal information about their employees. PIPEDA also applies to all personal data that flows across provincial or national borders, in the course of commercial activities.

The Commissioner focuses on resolving complaints through negotiation and persuasion, using mediation and conciliation if appropriate. However, if voluntary cooperation is not forthcoming, the Commissioner has the power to summon witnesses, administer oaths and compel the production of evidence. In cases that remain unresolved, particularly under PIPEDA, the complainant or the Commissioner may take the matter to Federal Court and seek a court order to rectify the situation.

As a public advocate for the privacy rights of Canadians, the Commissioner carries out the following activities:

Investigating complaints and issuing reports with recommendations to federal government institutions and private sector organizations to remedy situations, as appropriate;
Pursuing legal action before federal courts where appropriate to resolve outstanding matters;
Assessing compliance with obligations contained in the PA and PIPEDA through the conduct of independent audit and review activities;
Advising on, and reviewing, Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) of new and existing government initiatives;
Providing legal and policy analyses and expertise to help guide Parliament’s review of evolving legislation to ensure respect for individuals’ right to privacy;
Responding to inquiries from parliamentarians, individual Canadians and organizations seeking information and guidance, and taking proactive steps to inform them of emerging privacy issues;
Promoting privacy awareness and compliance, and fostering understanding of privacy rights and obligations through proactive engagement with federal government institutions, private-sector organizations, industry associations, legal community, academia, professional associations, and other stakeholders;
Preparing and disseminating public education materials, positions on evolving legislation, regulations and policies, guidance documents and fact sheets for use by the general public, federal government institutions and private sector organizations;
Conducting research and monitoring trends in technological advances and privacy practices, identify systemic privacy issues that need to be addressed by federal government institutions and private sector organizations and promoting integration of best practices; and
Working with privacy stakeholders from other jurisdictions in Canada and on the international scene to address global privacy issues that result from ever increasing transborder data flows.

Organizational Structure

The Privacy Commissioner is an Officer of Parliament who reports directly to the House of Commons and the Senate. The Commissioner may be assisted by an Assistant Commissioner, who has delegated responsibilities under both the PA and PIPEDA. At the time of writing this report, the position has been vacant since December 2013.

The OPC is structured in the following way:

Executive Secretariat

The Executive Secretariat ensures effective liaison and coordination with internal and external stakeholders and provides strategic advice so that the Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner are able to carry out their mandate to protect and promote privacy rights of individuals.

Privacy Act Investigations Branch

The PA Investigations Branch receives and investigates complaints from individuals who claim a breach of the PA, or complaints that are initiated by the Commissioner. The Branch also receives notifications of breaches from federal government organizations, and receives and reviews public interest disclosures made by them.

PIPEDA Investigations Branch

The PIPEDA Investigations Branch is divided between Ottawa and Toronto. In Ottawa, the Branch receives and investigates complaints of national scope by individuals or initiated by the Commissioner, from anywhere in Canada. In Toronto, the Branch investigates complaints particularly from the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) and coordinates public education and stakeholder outreach activities in the GTA.

Audit and Review Branch

The Audit and Review Branch audits organizations to assess their compliance with the requirements set out in the two federal privacy laws. The Branch also analyses and provides recommendations on Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) submitted to the OPC pursuant to the Treasury Board Secretariat Policy on Privacy Impact Assessments.

Communications Branch

The Communications Branch focuses on providing strategic advice and support for communications and public education activities for the OPC. In addition, the Branch plans and implements a variety of public education and communications activities through media monitoring and analysis, public opinion polling, media relations, publications, special events, outreach activities and the OPC web sites. The Branch is also responsible for the OPC’s Information Centre, which responds to requests for information from the public and organizations regarding privacy rights and responsibilities.

Legal Services, Policy and Research Branch

The Legal Services, Policy, Research and Technology Analysis Branch (LSPRTA) provides strategic legal and policy advice and conducts research on emerging privacy issues in Canada and internationally. More specifically, the Branch provides strategic legal advice to the Commissioners and various Branch Heads on the interpretation and application of the PA and PIPEDA in investigations and audits, as well as general legal counsel on a broad range of corporate and communication matters. LSPRTA represents the OPC in litigation matters before the courts and in negotiations with other parties both nationally and internationally. It reviews and analyzes legislative bills, government programs, public and private sector initiatives and provides strategic advice to the Commissioners on appropriate policy positions to protect and advance privacy rights in Canada. The Branch prepares for, represents and supports the Office in appearances before Parliament and in its relations with parliamentarians. Its analysts conduct applied research on the privacy implications of emerging societal and technological issues to support and inform the development of OPC policy guidance and best practices for relevant stakeholders. The Branch administers the OPC Research Contributions Program, which was launched in 2004, to advance knowledge and understanding of privacy issues and to promote enhanced protection of personal information. LSPRTA also identifies and analyzes technological trends and developments in electronic platforms and digital media; conducts research to assess the impact of technology on the protection of personal information in the digital world and provides strategic analysis and guidance on complex, varied and sensitive technological issues involving breaches in the security of government and commercial systems that store personal information.

Human Resources Management Branch

The Human Resources Management Branch is responsible for the provision of strategic advice, management and delivery of comprehensive human resources management programs in areas such as staffing, classification, staff relations, human resources planning, learning and development, employment equity, official languages and compensation.

Corporate Services Branch

The Corporate Services Branch provides advice and integrated administrative services such as corporate planning, resource management, financial management, information management and information technology, and general administration to managers and staff.

Access to Information and Privacy Directorate

The Acess to Infromation and Privacy (ATIP) Directorate is responsible for responding to formal requests for information from the public pursuant to the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. The ATIP Directorate is also responsible for developing internal policies and ensuring compliance relative to these acts.

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Organization Chart of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Text version

Organizational Chart
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Privacy Commissioner
- Executive Secretariat
- Assistant Privacy Commissioner
  - Audit and Review Branch
  - Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) Investigations Branch
  - Privacy Act Investigations Branch
  - Communications Branch
- Legal Services, Policy, Research and Technology Analysis Branch
- Corporate Services Branch
- Human Resources Management Branch
- Access to Information and Privacy Directorate

The ATIP Directorate is headed by a Director who is supported by two senior analysts.

Under section 73 of the ATIA, as the head of the OPC, the Privacy Commissioner’s authority has been delegated to the ATIP Director with respect to the application of the ATIA and its Regulations. A copy of that Delegation Order is attached as Appendix A.

The ATIP Director also serves as the OPC’s Chief Privacy Officer.

ATIP Directorate Activities – 2013-14

Training employees

In the reporting fiscal year, ATIP Training Sessions were offered to all new OPC employees and those returning from extended leave or temporary assignments elsewhere. The OPC has committed to training all new staff within three months of their arrival. At the conclusion of the year, 100% of new and returning employees had participated in the training sessions. Additionally, each Branch received an ATIP awareness session to reinforce knowledge of their responsibilities with respect to access and privacy legislation. The ATIP office also provides sessions as needed.

Enabling the organization

Throughout the year, the ATIP Directorate has been active in providing advice to all OPC staff with respect to informal requests for information. ATIP has also continued to support the Information Management function by providing advice on internal information handling practices. Notably, the ATIP Directorate played an active role in assisting in the creation of the OPC knowledge center. One of the key features of this new tool allows OPC staff to search depersonalized reports of findings from previous PA and PIPEDA investigations. These reports had historically been destroyed at the end of their respective retention periods. The ATIP Directorate depersonalized over ten years of reports allowing the OPC to preserve valuable corporate memory.

Contributing actively to decision making

The ATIP Director has played a collaborative role in the planning, development and updating of OPC policies, procedures and directives. The ATIP Director also sits on the OPC’s key strategic decision-making committees. The OPC’s recognition of the importance of integrating the ATIP Director in its core decision-making committees has ensured that the Access to Information Act is respected.

Implementing a new reporting structure

During the final quarter of the year, it was decided that the OPC ATIP Directorate would report directly to the Commissioner. This decision was in keeping with a recommendation that the OPC had made to other organizations, whereby the independence of the Chief Privacy Officer is ensured by having that function report directly to the head of the organization. This new reporting structure underlines the importance the OPC attributes to functions carried out by the ATIP Directorate and the need to ensure that it has independence and direct access to the organization head.

Access to Information Act Statistical Report and Interpretation

The OPC’s Statistical Report on the ATIA is attached in Appendix B.

The OPC received 98 formal requests under the ATIA during the 2013-14 fiscal year, which is nearly double from the previous year. Of those, 14 sought access to records which were not under the OPC’s control; these requests were therefore transferred to the appropriate federal institutions for processing. The majority of transfers were made to the Department of National Defence.

Requests under the ATIA

Text version

Requests under the ATIA

Year	2011/2012	2012/2013	2013/2014
Received	64	50	98
Transferred	21	20	14
Processed	37	36	70

In 2013-14, the ATIP Directorate responded to 84 new requests for information under the OPC’s control, which represented 3,862 pages of information.

Extensions were claimed with respect to 17 requests. In all, the OPC responded to 56 requests within the first 30 days and 17 requests within the extended time period, four of which were for more than 30 days.

Of the 84 requests completed during the fiscal year, 15 were for the contents of PA or PIPEDA investigation files, 13 related to information regarding privacy breaches that had been reported to the OPC, 11 sought access to correspondence sent and received by the Commissioner, 7 were for records relating to meetings between the OPC and various political parties, 3 were for information regarding bills that were introduced in the House of Commons and the remainder were for miscellaneous information.

The OPC endeavors to release as much information as possible. In 15 of the 84 requests processed, the documents were released in their entirety, in 34 cases the OPC made partial releases, and in only 1 instance was the information withheld entirely. Of the remaining requests, seven were abandoned by the applicants and in 12 cases no relevant records were found.

Section 16.1(1)(d) of the ATIA prohibits the OPC from releasing information it obtained during the course of its investigations or audits, even after the matter and all related proceedings have been concluded. The OPC, however, cannot refuse to disclose information it created during the course of an investigation or audit, once they and any related proceedings are completed – and subject to any applicable exemptions. With respect to requests for access to PA and PIPEDA investigation files, none were disclosed in their entirety—all had some information withheld under section 16.1(1)(d) and, in some cases, information was withheld under one or more of sections 19(1), 20(1)(b), 20(1)(c), 21(1)(a), 21(1)(b) and 23 as well.

As was the case in the previous reporting years, the exemption provision invoked most often was section 19(1) concerning the personal information of others, followed closely by section 16.1 with respect to information the OPC received or created during the course of an investigation and section 20 which protects information about a third party. In other cases this year the OPC also withheld information under one or more of sections 13(1), 15(1), 16(1)(c), 16(2)(c), 21(1)(a), (b) and 23 of the ATIA.

Of the 98 requests received this fiscal year, 53 were submitted by the public (54%), 37 by the media (38%), 5 by businesses (5%), 2 by academia (2%) and 1 by an organization (1%).

Requests under ATIA by Source

Requests under the ATIA by source

Text version

Requests under the ATIA by Source

Year	2011/2012	2012/2013	2013/2014
Media	10	9	37
Business	21	8	5
Public	27	28	53
Academia	5	3	2
Organisation	1	2	1

In addition to processing its own ATIA requests, the OPC was consulted on 29 occasions on a total of 288 pages. The Canada Border Services Agency consulted our Office the most often, requesting our representations on seven occasions; Industry Canada and the Canada Revenue Agency consulted our Office on three occasions; Justice Canada, the Treasury Board Secretariat, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Employment and Social Development Canada, and Public Works and Government Services Canada each consulted our Office on two occasions. We were consulted once by each of the following institutions: the Office of the Information Commissioner; the Correctional Service of Canada; the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission; the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada; and Health Canada. In 23 of the 29 cases, the OPC recommended full disclosure of the requested records.

Application fees amounted to $480.00 during the reporting period. In two instances the OPC waived the application fees. None of the requests required the assessment of reproduction fees, search fees, preparation fees or computer processing time.

In most cases where records were provided, electronic copies were given to the individuals. No one asked to be given access by viewing the records.

Access to Information Act complaints against the OPC

This fiscal year the OPC was notified by the OIC of seven complaints under the ATIA. Findings were issued by the Office of Information Commissioner (OIC) with respect to five complaints; in those cases the OIC concluded these complaints were “well founded”. The two other complaints are still ongoing. The OPC has three outstanding complaints under the ATIA from previous fiscal years for which findings from the OIC are expected in 2014-2015.

For additional information on the OPC’s activities, please visit www.priv.gc.ca.
Additional copies of this report may be obtained from:

Director, Access to Information and Privacy
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
30 Victoria Street, 1^st Floor
Gatineau, Quebec K1A 1H3

Appendix A – Access to Information Act
Delegation Order

The Interim Privacy Commissioner of Canada, as the head of the government institution, hereby designates puruant to section 73 of the Access to Information Act, the person holding the position set out below, or the person occupying on an acting basis that position, to exercise the powers, duties or functions of the Privacy Commissioner as specified below and as more fully described in Annex A:

Position	Sections of Access to Information Act
Director, ATIP	Act: 4(2.1), 7, 8(1), 9, 11(2) to (6), 12(2) and (3), 13 to 24, 25, 26, 27(1) and (4), 28(1), (2) and (4), 29(1), 32, 33, 35(2), 37(1) and (4), 29(1), 32, 33, 35(2), 37(1) and (4), 43(1), 44(2), 52(2) and (3), 69, 71, 72(1); and Regulations: 5, 6,(1), 7(2) and (3), 8, and 8.1.

This delegation of authority supersedes any previous delegation of the powers, duties and functions set out herein.

Dated at the City of Ottawa, this 9^th day of January, 2014.

(Original signed by)

Chantal Bernier
Interim Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Access to Information Act

12(3)Decide whether to give access in an alternative format

4(2.1)	Shall assist the person in connection with the request, respond to the request accurately and completely and provide timely access in the format requested
7	Respond to request for access within 30 days; give access or give notice
8(1)	Transfer of Request to government institution with greater interest
9	Extend time limit for responding to request for access
11(2), (3), (4), (5), (6)	Additional fees
12(2)(b)	Decide whether to translate requested record
13(1)	Shall refuse to disclose information obtained in confidence from another government
13(2)	May disclose any information referred to in 13(1) if the other government consents to the disclosure or makes the information public
14	May refuse to disclose information injurious to the conduct of federal-provincial affairs
15	May refuse to disclose information injurious to international affairs or defence
16	Series of discretionary exemptions related to law enforcement and investigations; security; and policing services for provinces or municipalities.
16.1(1)	In force April 1, 2007 - Specific to four named Officers of Parliament - Auditor General, Commissioner of Official Languages, Information Commissioner and Privacy Commissioner - shall refuse to disclose information obtained or created by them in the course of an investigation or audit
16.1(2)	In force April 1, 2007 - Specific to two named Officers of Parliament – Information and Privacy Commissioner - shall not refuse under 16.1(1) to disclose any information created by the Commissioner in the course of an investigation or audit once the investigation or audit and related proceedings are concluded
17	May refuse to disclose information which could threaten the safety of individuals
18	May refuse to disclose information related to economic interests of Canada
18.1(1)	May refuse to disclose confidential commercial information of Canada Post Corporation, Export Development Canada, Public Sector Pension Investment Board, or VIA Rail Inc.
18.1(2)	Shall not refuse under 18.1(1) to disclose information relating to general administration of the institution
19	Shall refuse to disclose personal information as defined in section 3 of the Privacy Act, but may disclose if individual consents, if information is publicly available, or disclosure is in accordance with section 8 of Privacy Act
20	Shall refuse to disclose third party information, subject to exceptions
21	May refuse to disclose records containing advice or recommendations
22	May refuse to disclose information relating to testing or auditing procedures
22.1	May refuse to disclose draft report of an internal audit
23	May refuse to disclose information subject to solicitor/client privilege
24	Shall refuse to disclose information where statutory prohibition (Schedule II)
25	Shall disclose any part of record that can reasonably be severed
26	May refuse to disclose where information to be published
27(1),(4)	Third party notification
28(1),(2),(4)	Receive representations of third party
29(1)	Disclosure on recommendation of Information Commissioner
32	Receive notice of investigation by Information Commissioner
33	Advise Information Commissioner of third party involvement
35(2)	Right to make representations to the Information Commissioner during an investigation
37(1)	Receive Information Commissioner’s report of findings of the investigation and give notice of action taken
37(4)	Give complainant access to information after 37(1)(b) notice
43(1)	Notice to third party (application to Federal court for review)
44(2)	Notice to applicant (application to federal Court by third party)
52(2)(b)	Request that section 52 hearing be held in the National Capital Region
52(3)	Request and be given right to make representations in section 51 hearings
69	Refuse to provide information that is excluded from the Act as a cabinet confidence
71(2)	Provide facilities for public to inspect manuals; exempt information may be severed from manuals
72(1)	Prepare annual report to Parliament

Access to Information Regulations

5	Inform requester of certain procedures regarding access
6(1)	Procedures relating to transfer of access request to another government institution under 8(1) of the Act
7(2) and (3)	Require payment of additional fees for access in certain situations
8	Form of Access
8.1	Determinations with respect to the conversion of records into different formats

Appendix B – Additional Reporting Requirements

Access to Information Act

In addition to the reporting requirements addressed in form TBS/SCT 350-62 "Report on the Access to Information Act", institutions are required to report on the following using this form:

Part III – Exemptions invoked

Paragraph 13(1)(e)	not invoked
Subsection 16.1(1)(a)	not invoked
Subsection 16.1(1)(b)	not invoked
Subsection 16.1(1)(c)	not invoked
Subsection 16.1(1)(d)	This subsection was invoked in 12 requests
Subsection 16.2(1)	not invoked
Subsection 16.3	not invoked
Subsection 16.4(1)(a)	not invoked
Subsection 16.4(1)(b)	not invoked
Subsection 16.5	not invoked
Subsection 18.1(1)(a)	not invoked
Subsection 18.1(1)(b)	not invoked
Subsection 18.1(1)(c)	not invoked
Subsection 18.1(1)(d)	not invoked
Subsection 20(1)(b.1)	not invoked
Subsection 20.1	not invoked
Subsection 20.2	not invoked
Subsection 20.4	not invoked
Subsection 22.1(1)	not invoked

Part IV – Exclusions cited

Subsection 68.1	not invoked
Subsection 68.2(a)	not invoked
Subsection 68.2(b)	not invoked
Subsection 69.1(1)	not invoked

Statistical Report on the Access to Information Act

Name of institution: Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Reporting period: 01/04/2013 to 31/03/2014

Part 1 – Requests under the Access to Information Act

**1.1 Number of Requests**
	Number of Requests
Received during reporting period	98
Outstanding from previous reporting period	0
Total	98
Closed during reporting period	84
Carried over to next reporting period	14

**1.2 Sources of requests**
Source	Number of Requests
Media	37
Academia	2
Business (Private Sector)	5
Organization	1
Public	53
Total	98

Part 2 - Requests closed during the reporting period

**2.1 Disposition and completion time**
Disposition of requests	Completion Time
Disposition of requests	1 to 15 days	16 to 30 days	31 to 60 days	61 to 120 days	121 to 180 days	181 to 365 days	More than 365 days	Total
All disclosed	6	8	1	0	0	0	0	15
Disclosed in part	5	9	16	3	0	1	0	34
All exempted	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1
All excluded	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
No records exist	10	2	0	0	0	0	0	12
Request transferred	14	0	0	0	0	0	0	14
Request abandoned	4	3	0	0	0	0	0	7
Treated informally	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1
Total	41	22	17	3	0	1	0	84

**2.2 Exemptions**
Section	Number of requests
Footnote 1 I.A.: International Affairs Return to footnote * Footnote 2 Def.: Defence of Canada Return to footnote Footnote 3 S.A.: Subversive Activities Return to footnote *
13(1)(a)	0
13(1)(b)	0
13(1)(c)	0
13(1)(d)	1
13(1)(e)	0
14(a)	0
14(b)	0
15(1) - I.A.^{Footnote *}	1
15(1) - Def.^{Footnote **}	0
15(1) - S.A.^{Footnote ***}	0
16(1)(a)(i)	0
16(1)(a)(ii)	0
16(1)(a)(iii)	0
16(1)(b)	0
16(1)(c)	2
16(1)(d)	0
16(2)(a)	0
16(2)(b)	0
16(2)(c)	3
16(3)	0
16.1(1)(a)	0
16.1(1)(b)	0
16.1(1)(c)	0
16.1(1)(d)	12
16.2(1)	0
16.3	0
16.4(1)(a)	0
16.4(1)(b)	0
16.5	0
17	0
18(a)	0
18(b)	1
18(c)	0
18(d)	0
18.1(1)(a)	0
18.1(1)(b)	0
18.1(1)(c)	0
18.1(1)(d)	0
19(1)	32
20(1)(a)	0
20(1)(b)	3
20(1)(b.1)	0
20(1)(c)	8
20(1)(d)	1
20.1	0
20.2	0
20.4	0
21(1)(a)	5
21(1)(b)	3
21(1)(c)	0
21(1)(d)	0
22	0
22.1(1)	0
23	2
24(1)	0
26	0

**2.3 Exclusions**
Section	Number of requests
68(a)	1
68(b)	0
68(c)	0
68.1	0
68.2(a)	0
68.2(b)	0
69(1)(a)	0
69(1)(b)	0
69(1)(c)	0
69(1)(d)	0
69(1)(e)	0
69(1)(f)	0
69(1)(g) re (a)	0
69(1)(g) re (b)	0
69(1)(g) re (c)	0
69(1)(g) re (d)	0
69(1)(g) re (e)	0
69(1)(g) re (f)	0
69.1(1)	0

**2.4 Format of information released**
Disposition	Paper	Electronic
All disclosed	11	4
Disclosed in part	22	12
Total	33	16

2.5 Complexity

**2.5.1 Relevant pages processed and disclosed**
Disposition of requests	Number of pages processed	Number of pages disclosed	Number of requests
All disclosed	236	236	15
Disclosed in part	4,599	3,626	34
All exempted	2	0	1
All excluded	0	0	0
Request abandoned	0	0	7

**2.5.2 Relevant pages processed and disclosed by size of requests**
Disposition	Less than 100 pages processed		101-500 pages processed		501-1000 pages processed		1001-5000 pages processed		More than 5000 pages processed
Disposition	Number of requests	Pages disclosed	Number of requests	Pages disclosed	Number of requests	Pages disclosed	Number of requests	Pages disclosed	Number of requests	Pages disclosed
All disclosed	15	236	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Disclosed in part	26	863	6	1,303	1	444	1	1,016	0	0
All exempted	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
All excluded	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Abandoned	7	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Total	49	1,099	6	1,303	1	444	1	1,016	0	0

**2.5.3 Other complexities**
Disposition	Consultation required	Legal advice sought	Total
All disclosed	2	0	2
Disclosed in part	22	4	26
All exempted	0	1	1
All excluded	0	0	0
Abandoned	0	0	0
Total	24	5	29

2.6 Deemed refusals

**2.6.1 Reasons for not meeting statutory deadline**
Number of requests closed past the statutory deadline	Principal Reason
Number of requests closed past the statutory deadline	Workload	External consultation	Internal consultation	Other
0	0	0	0	0

**2.6.2 Number of days past deadline**
Number of days past deadline	Number of requests past deadline where no extension was taken	Number of requests past deadline where an extension was taken	Total
1 to 15 days	0	0	0
16 to 30 days	0	0	0
31 to 60 days	0	0	0
61 to 120 days	0	0	0
121 to 180 days	0	0	0
181 to 365 days	0	0	0
More than 365 days	0	0	0
Total	0	0	0

**2.7 Requests for translation**
Translation Requests	Accepted	Refused	Total
English to French	0	0	0
French to English	0	0	0
Total	0	0	0

Part 3 - Extensions

**3.1 Reasons for extensions and disposition of requests**
Disposition of requests where an extension was taken	9(1)(a) Interference with operations	9(1)(b) Consultation		9(1)(c) Third party notice
Disposition of requests where an extension was taken	9(1)(a) Interference with operations	Section 69	Other	9(1)(c) Third party notice
All disclosed	0	0	1	0
Disclosed in part	0	0	16	5
All exempted	0	0	0	0
All excluded	0	0	0	0
No records exist	0	0	0	0
Request abandoned	0	0	0	0
Total	0	0	17	5

**3.2 Length of extensions**
Length of extensions	9(1)(a) Interference with operations	9(1)(b) Consultation		9(1)(c) Third party notice
Length of extensions	9(1)(a) Interference with operations	Section 69	Other	9(1)(c) Third party notice
30 days or less	0	0	12	5
31 to 60 days	0	0	4	0
61 to 120 days	0	0	0	0
121 to 180 days	0	0	0	0
181 to 365 days	0	0	1	0
365 days or more	0	0	0	0
Total	0	0	17	5

Part 4 - Fees

Fee Type	Fee Collected		Fee Waived or Refunded
Fee Type	Number of requests	Amount	Number of requests	Amount
Application	96	$480	2	$10
Search	0	$0	0	$0
Production	0	$0	0	$0
Programming	0	$0	0	$0
Preparation	0	$0	0	$0
Alternative format	0	$0	0	$0
Reproduction	0	$0	0	$0
Total	96	$480	2	$10

Part 5 - Consultations received from other institutions and organizations

**5.1 Consultations received from other government institutions and organizations**
Consultations	Other government institutions	Number of pages to review
Received during reporting period	29	279
Outstanding from the previous reporting period	1	14
Total	30	293
Closed during the reporting period	29	288
Pending at the end of the reporting period	1	5

**5.2 Recommendations and completion time for consultations received from other government institutions**
Recommendation	Number of days required to complete consultation requests
Recommendation	1 to 15 days	16 to 30 days	31 to 60 days	61 to 120 days	121 to 180 days	181 to 365 days	More than 365 days	Total
Disclose entirely	22	1	0	0	0	0	0	23
Disclose in part	3	1	1	0	0	0	0	5
Exempt entirely	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1
Exclude entirely	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Consult other institution	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Other	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Total	25	3	1	0	0	0	0	29

**5.3 Recommendations and completion time for consultations received from other organizations**
Recommendation	Number of days required to complete consultation requests
Recommendation	1 to 15 days	16 to 30 days	31 to 60 days	61 to 120 days	121 to 180 days	181 to 365 days	More than 365 days	Total
Disclose entirely	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Disclose in part	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Exempt entirely	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Exclude entirely	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Consult other institution	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Other	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Total	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Part 6 - Completion time of consultations on Cabinet confidences

Number of days	Number of responses received	Number of responses received past deadline
1 to 15	0	0
16 to 30	0	0
31 to 60	0	0
61 to 120	0	0
121 to 180	0	0
181 to 365	0	0
More than 365	0	0
Total	0	0

Part 7 - Resources related to the Access to Information Act

**7.1 Costs**
Expenditures	Amount
Salaries	$38,278
Overtime	$0
Goods and Services	$3,730
Professional services contracts	$2,970
Other	$760
Total	$42,008

**7.2 Human Resources**
Resources	Dedicated full-time to ATI activities	Dedicated part-time to ATI activities	Total
Full-time employees	0.00	0.57	0.57
Part-time and casual employees	0.00	0.00	0.00
Regional staff	0.00	0.00	0.00
Consultants and agency personnel	0.02	0.00	0.02
Students	0.00	0.00	0.00
Total	0.02	0.57	0.59

2. The Privacy Act

September 2014

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
30 Victoria Street, 1^st Floor
Gatineau, Quebec
K1A 1H3

819-994-5444, 1-800-282-1376
Fax 819-994-5424

Introduction

The Privacy Act came into effect On July 1, 1983. This Act imposes obligations on federal government departments and agencies to respect the privacy rights of individuals by limiting the collection, use and disclosure of personal information. The Act also gives individuals the right of access to their personal information and the right to request the correction of that information.

When the Federal Accountability Act received Royal Assent on December 12, 2006, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) was added to the Schedule of the Privacy Act along with other Agents of Parliament. Therefore, while not initially subject to the Act, the OPC became so on April 1, 2007.

Section 72 of the Act requires that the head of every federal government institution submit an annual report to Parliament on the administration of the Act within their institutions during the fiscal year.

The OPC is pleased to submit its seventh Annual Report which describes how we fulfilled our responsibilities under the Privacy Act in 2013-2014.

Mandate and Mission of the OPC

The OPC’s mission is to protect and promote the privacy rights of individuals.

As a public advocate for the privacy rights of Canadians, the Commissioner carries out the following activities:

Investigating complaints and issuing reports with recommendations to federal government institutions and private sector organizations to remedy situations, as appropriate;
Pursuing legal action before federal courts where appropriate to resolve outstanding matters;
Assessing compliance with obligations contained in the PA and PIPEDA through the conduct of independent audit and review activities;
Advising on, and reviewing, Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) of new and existing government initiatives;
Providing legal and policy analyses and expertise to help guide Parliament’s review of evolving legislation to ensure respect for individuals’ right to privacy;
Responding to inquiries from parliamentarians, individual Canadians and organizations seeking information and guidance, and taking proactive steps to inform them of emerging privacy issues;
Promoting privacy awareness and compliance, and fostering understanding of privacy rights and obligations through proactive engagement with federal government institutions, private-sector organizations, industry associations, legal community, academia, professional associations, and other stakeholders;
Preparing and disseminating public education materials, positions on evolving legislation, regulations and policies, guidance documents and fact sheets for use by the general public, federal government institutions and private sector organizations;
Conducting research and monitoring trends in technological advances and privacy practices, identify systemic privacy issues that need to be addressed by federal government institutions and private sector organizations and promoting integration of best practices; and
Working with privacy stakeholders from other jurisdictions in Canada and on the international scene to address global privacy issues that result from ever increasing transborder data flows.