2011-12 Annual Reports on the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act (ATIP)

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

1. The Access to Information Act

July 2012

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
112 Kent Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 1H3

(613) 947-1698, 1-800-282-1376
Fax (613) 947-6850
TDD (613) 992-9190
Follow us on Twitter: @privacyprivee

Introduction

The Access to Information Act (ATIA) came into effect on July 1, 1983. It provides Canadian citizens, permanent residents and any person and corporation present in Canada a right of access to information contained in government records, subject to certain specific and limited exceptions.

When the Federal Accountability Act received Royal Assent on December 12, 2006, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) was added to Schedule I of the ATIA along with other Agents of Parliament. So, while not initially subject to the ATIA, the OPC became so, on April 1, 2007.

Section 72 of the ATIA requires that the head of every federal government institution submit an annual report to Parliament on the administration of the Act within their institutions during the fiscal year.

The OPC is pleased to submit its fifth Annual Report which describes how we fulfilled our responsibilities under the ATIAduring the fiscal year 2011-2012.

Mandate / Mission of the OPC

The mandate of the OPC is to oversee compliance with both the Privacy Act (PA) which covers the personal information-handling practices of federal government departments and agencies, and the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA), Canada’s private sector privacy law.

The OPC’s mission is to protect and promote the privacy rights of individuals.

The Commissioner works independently from any other part of the government to investigate privacy complaints from individuals with respect to the federal public sector and certain aspects of the private sector. In public sector matters, individuals may complain to the Commissioner about any matter specified in Section 29 of the PA.

For matters relating to personal information in the private sector, the Commissioner may investigate complaints under Section 11 of PIPEDA except in the provinces that have adopted substantially similar privacy legislation, namely Québec, British Columbia, and Alberta. Ontario and New Brunswick now fall into this category with respect to personal health information held by health information custodians under their health sector privacy laws. However, even in those provinces with substantially similar legislation, and elsewhere in Canada, PIPEDA continues to apply to personal information collected, used or disclosed by all federal works, undertakings and businesses, including personal information about their employees. PIPEDA also applies to all personal data that flows across provincial or national borders, in the course of commercial transactions involving organizations subject to PIPEDA or to substantially similar legislation.

The Commissioner focuses on resolving complaints through negotiation and persuasion, using mediation and conciliation if appropriate. However, if voluntary co-operation is not forthcoming, the Commissioner has the power to summon witnesses, administer oaths and compel the production of evidence. In cases that remain unresolved, particularly under PIPEDA, the Commissioner may take the matter to Federal Court and seek a court order to rectify the situation.

As a public advocate for the privacy rights of Canadians, the Commissioner carries out the following activities:

Investigating complaints and issuing reports with recommendations to federal government institutions and private sector organizations to remedy situations, as appropriate;
Pursuing legal action before Federal Courts where appropriate to resolve outstanding matters;
Assessing compliance with obligations contained in the PA and PIPEDA through the conduct of independent audit and review activities, and publicly reporting on findings;
Advising on, and reviewing, Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) of new and existing government initiatives;
Providing legal and policy analyses and expertise to help guide Parliament’s review of evolving legislation to ensure respect for individuals’ right to privacy;
Responding to inquiries of Parliamentarians, individual Canadians and organizations seeking information and guidance and taking proactive steps to inform them of emerging privacy issues;
Promoting public awareness and compliance, and fostering understanding of privacy rights and obligations through: proactive engagement with federal government institutions, industry associations, legal community, academia, professional associations, and other stakeholders;
Preparing and disseminating public education materials, positions on evolving legislation, regulations and policies, guidance documents and research findings for use by the general public, federal government institutions and private sector organizations;
Conducting research and monitoring trends in technological advances and privacy practices, identify systemic privacy issues that need to be addressed by federal government institutions and private sector organizations and promoting integration of best practices; and

Working with privacy stakeholders from other jurisdictions in Canada and on the international scene to address global privacy issues that result from ever-increasing trans-border data flows.

Organizational Structure

The Privacy Commissioner is an Officer of Parliament who reports directly to the House of Commons and the Senate. The Commissioner is assisted by an Assistant Commissioner, who has delegated responsibilities under both the PA and PIPEDA.

The OPC is comprised of eight distinct branches:

Privacy Act Investigations Branch

The PA Investigations Branch receives and investigates complaints from individuals who claim a breach of the PA, or complaints that are initiated by the Commissioner. The Branch also receives notifications of breaches from federal government organizations, and receives and reviews public interest disclosures made by them. The Branch is headed by Ms. Sue Lajoie, Director General, PA Investigations.

PIPEDA Investigations Branch

The PIPEDA Investigations Branch is divided between Ottawa and Toronto. In Ottawa, the Branch receives and investigates all complaints of national scope by individuals or initiated by the Commissioner, from anywhere in Canada except from the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). In Toronto, the Branch investigates complaints from the GTA and coordinates public education and stakeholder outreach activities in the GTA. The Branch is headed by Mr. Brent Homan, Director General, PIPEDA, and the Toronto Office is headed by Mr. Lorne MacDougall, Director.

Audit and Review Branch

The Audit and Review Branch audits organizations to assess their compliance with the requirements set out in the two federal privacy laws. The Branch also analyses and provides recommendations on (PIAs) submitted to the OPC pursuant to the Treasury Board Secretariat Policy on Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs). The Branch is headed by Mr. Steven Morgan, Director General.

Communications Branch

The Communications Branch focuses on providing strategic advice and support for communications and public education activities for the OPC. In addition, the Branch plans and implements a variety of public education and communications activities through media monitoring and analysis, public opinion polling, media relations, publications, special events, outreach activities and the OPC web sites. The Branch is also responsible for the OPC’s Information Centre, which responds to requests for information from the public and organizations regarding privacy rights and responsibilities. The Branch is headed by Ms. Anne-Marie Hayden, Director General.

Legal Services, Policy and Research Branch

The Legal Services, Policy and Research Branch (LSPR) provides strategic legal and policy advice and conducts research on emerging privacy issues in Canada and internationally. More specifically, the Branch provides strategic legal advice to the Commissioners and various Branch Heads on the interpretation and application of the PA and PIPEDA in investigations and audits, as well as general legal counsel on a broad range of corporate and communication matters. The Branch represents the OPC in litigation matters before the courts and in negotiations with other parties both nationally and internationally. It reviews and analyzes legislative bills, government programs, public and private sector initiatives and provides strategic advice to the Commissioners on appropriate policy positions to protect and advance privacy rights in Canada. The Branch prepares for, represents and supports the office in appearances before Parliament and in its relations with Parliamentarians. The Branch conducts applied research on the privacy implications of emerging societal and technological issues to support and inform the development of OPC policy guidance and best practices for relevant stakeholders. The Branch administers the research contribution program, which was launched in 2004, to advance knowledge and understanding of privacy issues and to promote enhanced protection of personal information. Also housed in the Branch is the OPC Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Unit responsible for responding to formal requests for information from the public pursuant to the Access to Information and Privacy Acts. The ATIP Unit is also responsible for internal policies relative to these Acts. The Director of the ATIP Unit is also the Chief Privacy Officer for the OPC. The Branch is headed by Ms. Patricia Kosseim, Senior General Counsel and Director General.

Human Resources Management Branch

The Human Resources Management Branch is responsible for the provision of strategic advice, management and delivery of comprehensive human resource management programs in areas such as staffing, classification, staff relations, human resource planning, learning and development, employment equity, official languages and compensation. The Branch is headed by Ms. Maureen Munhall, Director.

Corporate Services Branch

The Corporate Services Branch provides advice and integrated administrative services such as corporate planning, resource management, financial management, information management/technology and general administration to managers and staff. The Branch is headed by Mr. Daniel Nadeau, Director General and Chief Financial Officer.

Technology Analysis Branch

The Technology Analysis Branch identifies and analyzes technological trends and developments in electronic platforms and digital media. The Branch conducts research to assess the impact of technology on the protection of personal information in the digital world. It also provides strategic analysis and guidance on complex, varied and sensitive technological issues involving breaches in the security of government and commercial systems that store personal information. As a corporate centre of expertise, the Branch analyzes current and emerging issues and trends in national security and public safety. The electronic media and their impact upon the privacy rights of Canadians represent another key area of interest for the Branch. The technological expertise concentrated in the Branch also supports core functions of the OPC, including audits, investigations and PIA reviews. The Branch is headed by Mr. Noël Lachance, Director.

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Organizational Chart of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Text version

Organizational Chart
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Privacy Commissioner
- Executive Secretariat
- Assistant Privacy Commissioner
  - Audit and Review Branch
  - Privacy Act Investigations Branch
  - PIPEDA Investigations Branch
  - Communications Branch
  - Technology Analysis Branch
- Legal Services, Policy and Research Branch
- Corporate Services Branch
- Human Resources Management Branch

The ATIP Unit is housed within the LSPR. ATIP is headed by a Director who is supported by one Senior Analyst.

Under section 73 of the ATIA the Privacy Commissioner, as the head of the OPC, has delegated her authority to the Senior General Counsel / Director General of the LSPR Branch and to the ATIP Director with respect to the application of the ATIA and its Regulations. A copy of that Delegation Order is attached as Appendix A.

The ATIP Director also serves as the OPC’s Chief Privacy Officer.

ATIP Unit Activities

In the reporting fiscal year, PA Awareness Sessions were given to new OPC employees, and it is our goal to provide refresher ATIP training to 85% of the existing employees before the end of fiscal year 2012-2013.

As the OPC is a relatively small organization, sessions are also given on an as-needed basis as well.

Throughout the year the ATIP Unit has been active in providing advice to all OPC staff with respect to informal requests for information. ATIP has also continued to support the Information Management function by providing input concerning proper information handling practices.

During the final quarter of the year, the ATIP Unit successfully completed an overall system upgrade with respect to the method of processing files. This was completed through the implementation of an electronic file tracking and redaction system which allows documents to be processed electronically rather than manually.

The ATIP Director sits on the OPC’s Policy Development Committee and has played a collaborative role in the planning, development and updating of OPC policies, procedures and directives in order to ensure that the Access to Information Act is respected.

Access to Information Act Statistical Report and Interpretation

The OPC’s statistical Report on the ATIA is attached at Appendix B.

The OPC received 64 formal requests under the ATIA during the fiscal year, which is one more than the previous year. Of those, 21 sought access to records which were not under the control of the OPC and they were therefore transferred to the appropriate federal institutions for processing. The majority of transfers were made to the Canada Border Service Agency, Citizenship and Immigration Canada, Canada Revenue Agency, Correctional Service Canada, Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

Requests under the ATIA

Text version

Requests under the ATIA

Year	2009/2010	2010/2011	2011/2012
Received	52	63	64
Transferred	26	31	21
Processed	26	32	37

Of the 43 requests for records under the OPC’s control (none had been carried over from the previous reporting period), the ATIP Unit had responded to 37 requests by the end of the fiscal year—six were carried forward to the next fiscal year. The 37 completed requests constituted 3,655 pages of information.

Extensions were claimed with respect to 22 requests, 20 of which were for more than 30 days. In all, the OPC responded to 36 requests within the first 30 days and 22 requests within the extended time period.

Of the 43 requests completed during the fiscal year, approximately ten were for copies of OPC Briefing Notes and related material, six were for the contents of PA or PIPEDA investigation files, one was for legal bills and travel accommodation, one for event planning services, two for information relating to human resources and the remainder were for miscellaneous information.

The OPC released all of the requested documents in seven cases and made partial releases in 25 cases. In regards to the other requests, in no instances was the information all exempted, in no instances was the request abandoned by the applicant and in five cases, no records existed. Four requests were treated informally.

Section 16.1 of the ATIA requires that the OPC protect the information obtained during the course of its investigations or audits even after the matter and all related proceedings have been concluded. So, with respect to requests for access to PA and PIPEDA investigation files, none were released in their entirety—all had some information withheld under section 16.1 and, in some cases, information was withheld under one or more of sections 19(1), 21(1)(a), 21(1)(b) and 23 as well.

As was the case in the last reporting year, the exemption provision invoked most often was section 19(1) concerning the personal information of others, followed closely by section 16.1 with respect to information the OPC received or created during the course of an investigation and section 23 with respect to solicitor-client information. However, in other cases this year the OPC also withheld information under one or more of sections 13(1)(a), 20(1)(b), 20(1)(c) and sections 21(1)(a) and (b) of the ATIA.

Of the 64 requests received this fiscal year, 27 were submitted by the public (42.2 %), ten by the media (15.6 %), 21 by businesses (32.8 %), five by academia (7.8 %) and one by an organization (1.6 %).

The OPC was notified of 14 complaints under the ATIA during the fiscal year compared to one the previous fiscal year. The findings by the Information Commissioner’s Office with respect to these complaints have not yet been issued.

Requests under ATIA by Source

Text version

Requests under the ATIA by Source

Year	2009/2010	2010/2011	2011/2012
Media	7	10	10
Business	10	6	21
Public	32	46	27
Academia	2	1	5

In addition to processing its own ATIA requests, the OPC was consulted on 13 occasions on a total of 655 pages. Treasury Board Secretariat consulted us on two occasions, Veterans Affairs on two occasions and we were consulted once by each of the following institutions: Office of the Information Commissioner, Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Industry Canada, Canada Revenue Agency, International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, Canada Border Services Agency, Financial Transaction and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada, and Canadian Air Transport Security Authority. In seven cases, the ATIP division recommended full disclosure of the requested records.

With respect to application fees, they amount to $185.00. None of the requests required the assessment of reproduction fees, search fees, preparation fees or computer processing time.

In most cases where records were provided, paper copies were given to the individuals. No one asked to be given access by viewing the records. Fifteen requesters asked to receive records electronically and we provided them by CD.

For additional information on the OPC’s activities, please visit www.priv.gc.ca.

Additional copies of this report may be obtained from:

Director, Access to Information and Privacy
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
112 Kent Street
Ottawa, ON K1A 1H3

Appendix A – Access to Information Act
Delegation Order

The Privacy Commissioner of Canada, as the head of the government institution, hereby designates pursuant to section 73 of the Access to Information Act, the persons holding the positions set out below, or the persons occupying on an acting basis those positions, to exercise the powers, duties or functions of the Privacy Commissioner as specified below and as more fully described in Annex A:

Position	Sections of Access to Information Act
Senior General Counsel/Director General, Legal Services, Policy and Research Director, ATIP	Act: 7(a), 8(1), 9, 11(2) to (6), 12(2) and (3), 13 to 24, 25, 26, 27(1) and (4), 28(1), (2) and (4), 29(1), 33, 35(2), 37(1) and (4), 43(1), 44(2), 52(2) and (3), 71(2), 72(1); and Regulations: 6(1) and 8.

In order to ensure independence of decision-making by the Senior General Counsel/Director General, Legal Services, Policy and Research, when exercising the powers under this delegation instrument, legal advice for the institution on specific matters included herein shall be provided by the Director, Legal Services and Senior Counsel.

This delegation of authority supersedes any previous delegation of the powers, duties and functions set out herein.

Dated at the City of Ottawa, this 24^th day of April, 2012.

(Original signed by)

Jennifer Stoddart
Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Access to Information Act

7(a)	Respond to request for access within 30 days; give access or give notice
18.1	Transfer of Request to government institution with greater interest
(9)	Extend time limit for responding to request for access
11(2), (3), (4), (5), (6)	Additional fees
12(2)(b)	Decide whether to translate requested record
12(3)	Decide whether to give access in an alternative format
13(1)	Shall refuse to disclose information obtained in confidence from another government
13(2)	May disclose any information referred to in 13(1) if the other government consents to the disclosure or makes the information public
14	May refuse to disclose information injurious to the conduct of federal-provincial affairs
15	May refuse to disclose information injurious to international affairs or defence
16	Series of discretionary exemptions related to law enforcement and investigations; security; and policing services for provinces or municipalities.
16.1(1)	In force April 1, 2007 - Specific to four named Officers of Parliament - Auditor General, Commissioner of Official Languages, Information Commissioner and Privacy Commissioner - shall refuse to disclose information obtained or created by them in the course of an investigation or audit
16.1(2)	In force April 1, 2007 - Specific to two named Officers of Parliament – Information and Privacy Commissioner - shall not refuse under 16.1(1) to disclose any information created by the Commissioner in the course of an investigation or audit once the investigation or audit and related proceedings are concluded
17	May refuse to disclose information which could threaten the safety of individuals
18	May refuse to disclose information related to economic interests of Canada
18.1(1)	May refuse to disclose confidential commercial information of Canada Post Corporation, Export Development Canada, Public Sector Pension Investment Board, or VIA Rail Inc.
18.1(2)	Shall not refuse under 18.1(1) to disclose information relating to general administration of the institution
19	Shall refuse to disclose personal information as defined in section 3 of the Privacy Act, but may disclose if individual consents, if information is publicly available, or disclosure is in accordance with section 8 of Privacy Act
20	Shall refuse to disclose third party information, subject to exceptions
21	May refuse to disclose records containing advice or recommendations
22	May refuse to disclose information relating to testing or auditing procedures
22.1	May refuse to disclose draft report of an internal audit
23	May refuse to disclose information subject to solicitor/client privilege
24	Shall refuse to disclose information where statutory prohibition (Schedule II)
25	Shall disclose any part of record that can reasonably be severed
26	May refuse to disclose where information to be published
27(1),(4)	Third party notification
28(1),(2),(4)	Receive representations of third party
29(1)	Disclosure on recommendation of Information Commissioner
33	Advise Information Commissioner of third party involvement
35(2)	Right to make representations to the Information Commissioner during an investigation
37(1)	Receive Information Commissioner’s report of findings of the investigation and give notice of action taken
37(4)	Give complainant access to information after 37(1)(b) notice
43(1)	Notice to third party (application to Federal court for review)
44(2)	Notice to applicant (application to federal Court by third party)
52(2)(b)	Request that section 52 hearing be held in the National Capital Region
52(3)	Request and be given right to make representations in section 51 hearings
71(2)	Exempt information may be severed from manuals
72(1)	Prepare annual report to Parliament

Access to Information Regulations

6(1)	Procedures relating to transfer of access request to another government institution under 8(1) of the Act
8	Form of Access

Appendix B – Additional Reporting Requirements

Access to Information Act

In addition to the reporting requirements addressed in form TBS/SCT 350-62 "Report on the Access to Information Act", institutions are required to report on the following using this form:

Part III – Exemptions invoked

Paragraph 13(1)(e)	not invoked
Subsection 16.1(1)(a)	not invoked
Subsection 16.1(1)(b)	not invoked
Subsection 16.1(1)(c)	not invoked
Subsection 16.1(1)(d)	This subsection was invoked in 5 requests
Subsection 16.2(1)	not invoked
Subsection 16.3	not invoked
Subsection 16.4(1)(a)	not invoked
Subsection 16.4(1)(b)	not invoked
Subsection 16.5	not invoked
Subsection 18.1(1)(a)	not invoked
Subsection 18.1(1)(b)	not invoked
Subsection 18.1(1)(c)	not invoked
Subsection 18.1(1)(d)	not invoked
Subsection 20(1)(b.1)	not invoked
Subsection 20.1	not invoked
Subsection 20.2	not invoked
Subsection 20.4	not invoked
Subsection 22.1(1)	not invoked

Part IV – Exclusions cited

Subsection 68.1	not invoked
Subsection 68.2(a)	not invoked
Subsection 68.2(b)	not invoked
Subsection 69.1(1)	not invoked

REPORT ON THE ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACT

Institution Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada				Reporting period 04/01/2011 to 03/31/2012
Source	Media	Academia	Business	Organization	Public
Source	10	5	21	1	27

I *Requests under the Access to Information Act*
Type of request	Number of requests
Received during reporting period	64
Outstanding from previous period	0
TOTAL	64
Completed during reporting period	58
Carried Forward	6

II *Disposition of request completed*
#	Disposition of requests	Number of requests
1.	All Disclosed	7
2.	Disclosed in part	25
3.	Nothing disclosed (excluded)	0
4.	Nothing disclosed (exempt)	0
5.	Unable to process	21
6.	Abandonned by applicant	5
7.	Abandoned by applicant	0
8.	Treated informally	0
	TOTAL	58

III *Exemptions invoked*
Section	Number of times
S. 13(1)(a)	1
(b)	0
(c)	0
(d)	0
(d)	0
S. 14	0
S. 15(1) International rel.	0
Defence	0
Subversive activities	0
S. 16(1)(a)	0
(b)	0
(c)	0
(d)	0
S. 16(2)	0
S. 16(3)	0
S. 17	0
S. 18(a)	0
S. 18(b)	0
(c)	0
(d)	0
S. 19(1)	24
S. 20(1)(a)	0
(b)	13
(c)	2
(d)	0
S. 21(1)(a)	18
(b)	5
(c)	0
(d)	0
S. 22	0
S. 23	12
S. 24	0
S. 25	0

IV *Exclusions cited*
Section	Number of times
S. 68(a)	0
(b)	0
(c)	0
S. 69(1)(a)	0
(b)	0
S. 69(1)(c)	0
(d)	0
(e)	0
(f)	0
(g)	0

V *Completion time*
Period	Number of requests
30 days or under	36
31 to 60 days	6
61 to 120 days	2
121 days or over	14

VI *Extentions*
Type of Extensions	30 days or under	31 days or over
Searching	19
Consultation	2
Third party	1
TOTAL	22

VII *Translations*
Translations requested	Number of requests
English to French	0
French to English	0

VIII *Method of access*
Method	Number of requests
Copies given	21
Examination	0
Copies and examination	0

IX *Fees*
Net fees collected
Application fees	$185.00
Preparation	$0.00
Reproduction	$0.00
Computer processing	$0.00
Searching	$0.00
TOTAL	$185.00

Fees waived	No. of times	$
$25.00 or under	1	$5.00
Over $25.00	0	$0.00

X *Costs*
Financial (all reasons)	Cost
Salary	$88,907.93
Administration (O and M)	$72,649.11
TOTAL	$161,557.04
Person year utilization (all reasons)
Person year (decimal format)	1.05

TBS/SCT 350-62 (Rev. 1999/03)

2. The Privacy Act

July 2012

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
112 Kent Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 1H3

(613) 947-1698, 1-800-282-1376
Fax (613) 947-6850
TDD (613) 992-9190
Follow us on Twitter: @privacyprivee

Introduction

The Privacy Act came into effect On July 1, 1983. This Act imposes obligations on federal government departments and agencies to respect the privacy rights of individuals by limiting the collection, use and disclosure of personal information. The Act also gives individuals the right of access to their personal information and the right to request the correction of that information.

When the Federal Accountability Act received Royal Assent on December 12, 2006, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) was added to the Schedule of the Privacy Act along with other Agents of Parliament. So, while not initially subject to the Act, the OPC became so on April 1, 2007.

Section 72 of the Act requires that the head of every federal government institution submit an annual report to Parliament on the administration of the Act within their institutions during the fiscal year.

The OPC is pleased to submit its fifth Annual Report which describes how we fulfilled our responsibilities under the Privacy Act during the fiscal year 2011-2012.

Mandate / Mission of the OPC

The OPC’s mission is to protect and promote the privacy rights of individuals.

As a public advocate for the privacy rights of Canadians, the Commissioner carries out the following activities:

Investigating complaints and issuing reports with recommendations to federal government institutions and private sector organizations to remedy situations, as appropriate;
Pursuing legal action before Federal Courts where appropriate to resolve outstanding matters;
Assessing compliance with obligations contained in the PA and PIPEDA through the conduct of independent audit and review activities, and publicly reporting on findings;
Advising on, and reviewing, Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) of new and existing government initiatives;
Providing legal and policy analyses and expertise to help guide Parliament’s review of evolving legislation to ensure respect for individuals’ right to privacy;
Responding to inquiries of Parliamentarians, individual Canadians and organizations seeking information and guidance and taking proactive steps to inform them of emerging privacy issues;
Promoting public awareness and compliance, and fostering understanding of privacy rights and obligations through: proactive engagement with federal government institutions, industry associations, legal community, academia, professional associations, and other stakeholders;
Preparing and disseminating public education materials, positions on evolving legislation, regulations and policies, guidance documents and research findings for use by the general public, federal government institutions and private sector organizations;
Conducting research and monitoring trends in technological advances and privacy practices, identify systemic privacy issues that need to be addressed by federal government institutions and private sector organizations and promoting integration of best practices; and
Working with privacy stakeholders from other jurisdictions in Canada and on the international scene to address global privacy issues that result from ever-increasing trans-border data flows.